October 22, 2026
As of mid-October, Sonoma County lets a grower pull a vineyard, farm something else on the ground for a time, and later return to vines under a replant permit. Before the change, that return counted as new development. The condition is a cultivation record: five straight years of active farming before the application, on a footprint that has not grown. For anyone weighing Pinot Noir and Chardonnay ground around Sebastopol, Graton and Green Valley, this moves the question that matters. This season's price per ton tells you little about a parcel's floor. The parcel's paperwork, and how much time is left on it, tell you more.
The paperwork carries more weight because the two usual backstops are weak. A short 2026 crop has not set off a bidding war for Russian River Valley Pinot. And the crop Sebastopol was known for before vineyards, the Gravenstein apple, is in a worse year than grapes.
The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 6571 on September 15, 2026. It was introduced August 18 and passed 5–0. Under its own terms, it takes effect 30 days after passage, which puts the effective date in mid-October.
The ordinance amends the county's Vineyard Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, known as VESCO. It changes the meaning of "vineyard replanting." The term now covers converting a perennial crop, a row crop or any crop that is plowed or tilled and harvested annually into vineyard. That applies only where the land "has been under active cultivation for at least five years immediately preceding the filing of a permit application" and the replanted area does not grow. The definition of orchard replanting changed the same way.
The old rule is where the risk sat. The Press Democrat reported that, according to Agricultural Commissioner Andrew Smith, growers had to get a replanting permit before pulling trees or vines. If they did not, any later vineyard or orchard counted as a new crop and went through a costlier, more intensive permit process. In the same report, Supervisor Lynda Hopkins described the change as support for diversification "as we weather this perfect market storm that we're seeing in the winegrape industry." Don McEnhill of Russian Riverkeeper called the amendments reasonable and said his group did not see them "opening the door to anything bad."
A replanted block still has to meet VESCO's standards, including setbacks from streams and wetlands, engineered plans on steep slopes or unstable soils, and winterization. The county staff report lists those requirements.
The rule turns a vineyard's past into something a buyer needs to check. Two time limits now set how much room a parcel has:
A lot of acreage now sits inside these windows. In a September 16 Press Democrat report, Smith told supervisors the county is "down to 58,000 acres of winegrapes," with about 6,000 acres under open replant permits. Dayna Ghirardelli, executive director of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau, told the paper that the county counted more than 2,700 vineyard acres taken out of production between October 2024 and August 2025. Smith noted that whether those acres are actually replanted "remains to be seen." Any parcel coming to market around Sebastopol now has a permit status, and that status belongs in the price.
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Owners and buyers should confirm how a particular parcel's permits and history apply with the county Agricultural Commissioner's office and their own counsel.
The usual theory says a small harvest should firm up grape prices. Sebastopol's own harvest did not bear that out.
Picking started July 16 at Dutton Ranch's Jewell Vineyard in Graton, the earliest start to a Sonoma County harvest in at least 40 years, the Press Democrat reported. Schramsberg Vineyards, which has bought Jewell Pinot for more than two decades for its sparkling wines, took 12 tons, about 35% below an average year. Co-owner Steve Dutton still had uncontracted grapes for sale. "We pruned for a lighter crop because we didn't want to have unsold fruit this year," he told the paper.
By September, Turrentine Brokerage's Christian Klier told the Press Democrat that some Russian River Valley vineyards that usually yield 3 to 5 tons an acre were producing 1 to 1.5. Short supply did bring buyers back for one variety. Napa Sauvignon Blanc sold for nearly $1,000 a ton above its 2025 district average, and buyers then cleared Sonoma's supply at about the 2025 average of $1,871. Pinot Noir saw no such rush. Turrentine's August market update said other light varieties had "not yet driven additional interest." It also warned that another light crop is unlikely to lift demand or pricing for wine already on the market.
Karissa Kruse, president of Sonoma County Winegrowers, gave a more hopeful account in mid-September. She said growers' phones had started ringing and that grapes without a home earlier in the year were finding buyers. Even in her account, a grower who sells half the usual tonnage at roughly the same price brings in about half the revenue, while fuel and fertilizer costs keep rising.
The most recent full-year price data is the 2025 Final Grape Crush Report, published April 30, 2026. It covers the 2025 crop. Nothing comparable for 2026 will be out until next year. The figures below are for District 3, which covers Sonoma and Marin counties. The 2024 rows come from the 2024 Final Grape Crush Report.
| District 3, 2025 crop vs. 2024 crop | Pinot Noir | Chardonnay |
|---|---|---|
| Tons crushed, 2024 | 49,562.1 | 72,594.2 |
| Tons crushed, 2025 | 39,081.1 | 89,892.5 |
| Avg. price on purchased grapes, 2024 | $3,890.39/ton | $2,590.41/ton |
| Avg. price on purchased grapes, 2025 | $3,839.45/ton | $2,433.24/ton |
Pinot Noir tonnage in the district fell by about a fifth from the 2024 crop to the 2025 crop, and the average price on purchased fruit still slipped about 1%. Chardonnay tonnage rose by nearly a quarter, and its price fell about 6%. Even the 2025 Pinot figure is probably generous. In the Press Democrat's March coverage of the preliminary report, Klier said district averages reflect long-term contracts signed years ago, many with built-in annual increases. "I think we probably have another two years before we actually see the district average reflect today's pricing market for Sonoma County Pinot Noir," he said. The preliminary county figures in that article showed Sonoma Pinot up 9% to $3,687 a ton. The final district series shows a small decline. The two use different measures, but they don't even agree on direction.
For a buyer, the practical point is that the published average mostly reflects older contracts with price escalators. A block with an in-force contract earns something close to that average. A block selling on the open market earns whatever today's buyers will pay. On a vineyard near Sebastopol, find out which kind you are buying before you lean on the average.
On paper, the new rule makes it easier to fall back on other crops. Smith told the Press Democrat that farmers have asked about agave, avocados, high-density olives, vegetables and other tree fruit. Around Sebastopol, the crop with the deepest local roots is the apple, and apples had a worse 2026 than grapes.
The Press Democrat reported in August that early heat and fire blight had cut Gravenstein yields sharply across Sebastopol-area orchards, and that some growers had ended their Gravenstein sales season early. The same report said Manzana Products Co., the area's remaining processor, is moving all operations to Washington next year. Its CEO, Andy Kay, expected about 4,000 tons from Sonoma County growers this year instead of 8,000. The 2025 county crop report lists 614 acres of Gravenstein and 1,966 bearing acres of apples in all.
Small new buyers and processors are appearing. Ethic Ciders and Slow Food Russian River now run a free community apple press on Tuesdays in Sebastopol. They bought it with a $90,000 grant from the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and it can handle up to a ton of apples a day. That press serves backyard and small-farm growers. It cannot replace a commercial buyer for a block that was once in vines.
This is why the five-year cultivation record matters so much in west county. Ground left bare to wait out the market may not show the active cultivation the new pathway asks for. Ground kept in another crop may still qualify, subject to the county's review of that parcel, even if the interim crop barely pays for itself. Whether a specific block qualifies is a question for the Agricultural Commissioner's office and the owner's counsel.
Does the new rule apply to a vineyard that was already pulled? The pathway depends on active cultivation for the five years immediately before the replant application, on a footprint that has not grown. Ask the county about a specific parcel's history before you assume it qualifies.
How long can a replant permit stay open? Five years, plus one five-year extension if it is requested in writing before the permit expires, for up to 10 years.
When will 2026 grape prices show up in official data? Not until next year's crush reports, and according to Klier, district averages may take another two years to reflect current Sonoma Pinot pricing.
At Wine Country Consultants, we read a west Sonoma County vineyard's permit file, cultivation record and fruit contracts alongside the soil and clones, because together they decide how much room the next owner has. If you own or are considering Pinot or Chardonnay ground around Sebastopol, schedule a confidential consultation and we will go through that file with you and the right specialists.
We are a family real estate firm focused on legacy vineyards and wineries. Our unique approach to buying and selling properties highlights a deep understanding of the historical importance every property holds as well as its potential in today’s market. Contact us today to find out how we can be of assistance to you!